SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Libertarian Discussion Forum

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Neocon who wrote (2655)5/12/1999 12:23:00 AM
From: MeDroogies  Read Replies (1) of 13056
 
While some Libertarians feel that arresting a drunk driver is unreasonable because he hasn't "done anything wrong", I disagree. The minute he sits behind the wheel, he has done something wrong. He has put others at an excessive (not unreasonable - excessive) risk of injury.
I don't believe in roadblocks, but I don't have a problem with an officer pulling over a weaving vehicle.
I just got back from vacation in NC. In Kitty Hawk, 4 teenagers were killed by a "drunk" woman. Likelihood is (due to her long history of drinking) that she was operating her car as normally as possible at .25 alcohol level (4 hours AFTER the accident). Alcoholics tend to operate, seemingly normally, at an elevated blood alcohol level. However, minor impairments that aren't noticeable lead to mildly erratic behavior. In this case, she ran a red light.
I'm not overly happy with this solution, but it is reasonable in light of the fact that so many fatalities on the road are a result of drunk driving.
One last fact about this worth pondering: the drunk driver isn't usually killed because their body is relatively limp on impact. They tend to get tossed around and suffer some level of injury - but not usually death. Invariably, others suffer at the hands of a drunk driver.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext