Auric - so you are saying that if the NYSE in fact acquires the PHLX and takes an assignment of UTTC's contract with the PHLX to operate VTS and other VWAp iterations, you will concede that this is not just a "tout"? OK if I remind of that if it happens? Or will you be long gone?
By the way, you are so free to insult the hard work of the people who created ATG and have positioned it to be a player in this explosive area of e-commerce in the financial services area -- but what puzzles me is, on what do you base your statement to the effect that this is a pure "tout"? It seems to me that your modus operandi is to identify any stock that experiences 600% growth in 2 months and begin with the premise that it is a tout, and then find anything you can to support the notion that others in the particular market sector are more established or are backed my more conventional, well-known names, etc, but without really making any effort to understand their business.
If you understood ATG's business, you would know that VTS is just the tip of the iceberg, that the other things they are working on (eMC, eOX, eAS, NextExchange, Gomez) all are going to contribute greatly to the value creation that I predict is going to happen here, that they have a lot of financial support, and that the things you deride as tout are probably all true or close to true in their "rumored" format and that this is anything but a pump and dump, or tout.
The failure to understand that which you insult so condescendingly will be your undoing on this one. I concede that a lot can slip between the "cup" and the "lip", but I know that this is NOT just a tout. No "tout" in America could stabilize at over $10 a share and get away with it for a month. IMHO, the markets are just that dynamic. |
