SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Libertarian Discussion Forum

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Richard Babusek who wrote (2816)5/12/1999 2:39:00 PM
From: Neocon  Read Replies (1) of 13056
 
Ricardo, there are only two reasons besides the sheer illegality to object to the counterfeiter's activities. The first is that he is hurting as least as much as he is helping, since he is creating disincentives for the poor to improve their lot, or giving cash to addicts and the like. On the other hand, if no one knows of his activities except the beneficiaries, and they do not know that it is ongoing, and so long as he supports no one long term, he cannot create disincentives, and if he is careful in his inquiries, he will rarely merely feed a vice. The other is the potential for inflationary effects. But if he is personally handing out the money, it is unlikely that he will personally inject so much into the money supply to appreciably affect inflation. For those reasons, I would probably leave him be. However, those are also the ways in which he differs from the government, which could cause harm through inflation, and which could cause massive perverse side- effects of through welfare support...
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext