Yes, that too qualifies as a bash coming from you- though it's probably the first starkly factual posts I've seen from you, it is devoid of anything but unrealistically negative implication. Is there something abnormal about those figures when compared to other start-up outfits? Perhaps you'd like to name all the big board stocks that have negative earnings and call them scams too(sorry, maybe that word never crept into your posts???, eh? Tell us true if you used that word.) The dilution you mention is tame, IMHO- and DOES point to the speculative notion that folks ARE willing to be paid in stock rather than cash- a bullish sign if true as evidenced. The potential of DCHT's products as evidenced by who their customers are and the ongoing research, development, deployments, and current expansion remains great.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but by your analysis DCHT should have gone under by about last month..yet they continue on. How can that be? I know, you've presumed as true certain financial notions that none of us have any knowledge of, right? Even though they go on and on like the energizer bunny, you assume they have had no means to do so, as they apparently continue to do. Let me state it plainly, YOU BASH! Your analysis flies in the face of what's going on with DCHT. |
