SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : George Gilder - Forbes ASAP

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: crc who wrote (1519)5/12/1999 7:05:00 PM
From: George Gilder  Read Replies (5) of 5853
 
Cable is ideal where suitable coax already reaches--that is about one fourth to one third of all households. DSL is inferior to cable modems (it is a dedicated circuit with DSL modems on each end and none of the efficiencies that a shared medium offers for bursty data and point multipoint communications and video conferences). But it is widely available and will serve many households that are unreached by cable but are within the 18K foot radius that DSL requires. Its penetration and nominal bandwidth will be somewhat less than cable, perhaps 25 percent at T-1 rates. CDMA wireless will be more expensive than either since it will have to compete with voice for spectrum, but it will be almost universally available at T-1 speeds or below. LMDS and the like will reach millions of businesses and some high end residences reachable point to point. DBS will be universally available but suffer from the limitation of satellite bandwidth and delays. There will be room for many competitors. The local loop will be one of the most hotly contested markets in the global economy. Flying over all will be globalstar, teledesic et al, providing connectivity to portions of the world (about half) unreached by all the other systems.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext