SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!!

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: The Philosopher who wrote (38121)5/13/1999 4:16:00 AM
From: nihil  Read Replies (1) of 108807
 
Everyone, please stop this number discussion . This thread is very hot and quite ridiculous. Consult any short treatise or encyclopaedia under "number."

In duodecimal notation, the first 14 positive integers are "named"
1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,t,e,10,11,12 ... You see that "4" is the fourth in the series, and "t" is the tenth. "10" is the twelfth.
All of this discussion of 4 in base four arithmetic, deals with an undefined term. In the base four system the first 14 positive intgerers are "named"
1,2,3,10,11,12,13,20,21, 22,23,30,31,32. Notice the fourth integer is "named" 10 = 1 x 10^1 or = 1 x (4^1)base 4.
"1" is the only integer name invariant under change of base. This is because i^0 is identically equal to 1 (where i = any integer).

Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext