SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Iomega Thread without Iomega
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Ken Pomaranski who wrote (9902)5/13/1999 1:54:00 PM
From: eric larson  Read Replies (1) of 10072
 
Ken, please specify names and example 'dreamland scenarios' of your following charge:

"...bulls fabricate dreamland scenarios that not only do not fit reality, but are far worse than anything Rocky has ever been accussed of."

...rather than implying by generality that all bulls are naive, unreflective nitwits. Or is it your intention to be generally insulting to anyone bullish on Iomega? If the latter is the case, then you're simply a pig.

Of course, since you've commented that you'd get back into IOM if you saw positive developments, you certainly can't be self-servingly motivated to bash the bulls to encourage selling to try and keep available a low-price entry point later.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News