Rhino, I would also like to see more "reasoned discussion" on this thread. More factual analysis, whether it happens to be positive or negative. But WLD is not contributing to reasoned discussion here. He is not using factual analysis. One of his favorite techniques is to pose questions which imply a certain answer without ever providing any evidence to support his implied answer. Questions like: 'Didn't Dave dump his 3 million shares today?' If WLD really wanted answers to the questions he poses, he could do his own research and find the facts. Apparently, that's not what he wants, he simply wants to raise doubts.
You ask if our information is really "any more concrete than his?" Yes it is. We have independently verified assay results. We have reports from people with solid professional reputations, such as Gordon House. We have publicly-issued statements from the officers of a publicly-traded company, who are legally accountable in a court of law to both the SEC and the shareholders.
What have we gotten from WLD, an anonymous, unaccountable individual? We've gotten a lot of suggestive and misleading questions and statements, sometimes outright lies.
I sincerely believe that WLD is a paid manipulator. I've come to this conclusion because of the timing of his appearance on this board, because of the manipulative character of his messages, and because of the excessive number of his messages. If he is a paid manipulator, then his activity on this board would be at least unethical and probably illegal. I believe it is violation of SI's Terms of Use. But this may be difficult to prove. In the meantime, it clear that WLD has violated the Terms of Use by excessive posting. Yesterday he posted 23 messages in about 3 hours. It is for this reason that I asked the Webmaster to revoke his membership. No one should be allowed to monopolize a message board.
|
