SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : e.Digital Corporation(EDIG) - Embedded Digital Technology
EDIG 0.00010000.0%Mar 20 5:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Joe Lyddon who wrote (4196)5/14/1999 4:39:00 PM
From: chris431  Read Replies (1) of 18366
 
"If it's similar to a WAV file, they could use a compressed format and get more songs on a CD..."

Several weeks ago I made a post which included my belief that MP3 players using cd are actually about the best idea for MP3 devices at the moment. Problem is one would need a cd-r to burn their compilations. Yet, at 650mb per cd-r, at around 3.5mb/avg. per song, you get 185 songs or 650 minutes of music on 1 cd. This is why I think the CD MP3 players are pretty neat compared to paultry 32mb or 64mb devices. But alas, when it is compressed, you need a new device to read the compressed format....which is really what this board has been discussing.

Chris
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext