International Precious Metals (IPMCF) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: C L who wrote (3788)	3/9/1997 9:20:00 PM
From: ddl	of 35569

CL, as usual, Great Post...Don't you love these new investor's who do their DD. You know what I really hate, it's promoters who make things look like they got the same as us. People who like to ride on our tail by twisting words, meanings, etc. See some of the comments comming out of the neighbours who just moved in? <<Now we're talking about a 50% increase in probable gold, if I read Hewlett correctly, + maybe a lot better recovery + maybe PGE's + maybe sharing recovery facilities with IPM? + ??????? >>, <<but the Maxam's Friday news now puts this company in another league. I am expecting at least a double next week with a possibility of 50% of IPM share price in a few weeks.>> All I can tell these tail draggers is watch out when we break away. The true value of proven and professional R&D + the RIGHT property = $$$$$$$$$$$$$$, and like that CIS poster says, so far away so fast, it'll be too expensive for most to join the party. See y'all then - Denis

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next