Medinah Mining Inc. (MDHM) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Medinah Mining Inc. (MDHM)

MDMN 0.000001000

-99.0%

Jun 3 1:07 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Jim Gold who wrote (14046)	5/18/1999 7:49:00 AM
From: Mike Gold	Read Replies (1) of 25548

Jim, the claims map should be in the House Report. I believe the full House report will end up being posted on the website. One thing to keep in mind about the Greg Lillar report-he was only there a couple of days and had a very tight time frame to get his report out. I suspect when you see the House report, you will notice a number of differences. In particular, his Los Dos Marias portion of the report was brief and IMO, incomplete. He failed to discuss the connection or lack there of between LDM and Lipangue, he failed to mention the intrusive related deposit at LDM(I think he grouped it the shear zone deposit) and only mentioned the mantos deposits in passing. On the other hand, he did say he believed the gold shear zone deposit is much larger than what was indicated in House's Geology map and should be the primary focus of exploration there.(ie shear zone size approx 1 kilometer x 100 meter x unlimited depth-several times the size of the breccia pipe.) He does recommend more sampling, trenching etc at LDM while House is ready to go ahead and turn LDM into a pin cushion.) Go Go Gordon!

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next