International Precious Metals (IPMCF) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: O. H. Rundell who wrote (3806)	3/10/1997 9:31:00 AM
From: ddl	of 35569

OH; Can't answer for the other 2 but for myself.... I guess it's easier when you're sitting on both sides of the fence and perhaps I will regret not doing the same, but that remains to be seen. For now, from my point of view, Maxam is trying to move into the neighbourhood and pick up on IPM's diligent and expensive work. Sure I know that Maxam is the same neighbour we previously had, before he put on a new face, and that he's the same guy we were partners with and now bought out. I also don't appreciate the fact that everyone likes to comment on the fact that Maxam is next to and abutting our southern border.....BUT how far is our southern border from the 6 km grids or the sweat pot?????? Do you really think IPM would be foolish enough to allow someone/anyone to slide right in next door and reap all the benefits of the last 2 years sweat and tears!!! I doubt it. Mr. Runyon may be very shrewed in his business afairs, and it's evident, but to think moving into the neighbourhood gives him the right to elevate himself/his property to that of IPM is being a bit speculative IMHO. :-) Chuckie, when you look at that map on page 6 & 7, do you see any neighbours???? ;-) - Denis

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next