>> For example, it was primarily as a result of suggestions made from people right here that DGIV had a presence at the NMSS booth at the New York IP Telephony convention <<
Funny you should use that as an example to prove your point. I thought that it actually turned out to be bad advice and that the "appearance" was a let down, didn't accomplish anything that we ever heard about, and certainly didn't support the share price. Actually, I think it had the opposite affect. It also, in retrospect, seems to have been unnecessary, since DGIV's business plan didn't then, and, as far as I can tell, does not now, call for making deals with U.S. entities. In my memory that "appearance" was ill-conceived, poorly executed, and a waste of time, effort, and money.
But hey, that was then.
We're not there now.
Though it would be nice to find out exactly where we are.
I like what's being suggested, by the run up in DGIV's stock price, about where we might in fact be and/or are going.
Meanwhile, let's let boregones be bygones.
I expect DGIV has all the advice it currently needs.
Seems to be doing things right this time.
But I guess we'll find out for sure.
--dch |
