>> Mark ever considered that the person you insist on slamming every
>> chance you get is a living, breathing human being?
So are the analysts he berates, by name, in his columns. Those guys depend on their good name to make a living, but that doesn't stop Cramer from ripping them apart. Yes, you'll tell me he rips them apart because they are wrong sometimes. Well, as you've stated, Cramer is wrong sometimes too.
I really don't get why you think he should be immune to the scrutiny that he so devilishly gives to every other commentator. I really, truly, don't understand the double standard here. What am I missing? Is it just that you guys think he's "less wrong" than the analysts he pillories? What is it about his rantings that make you idolize him even more whilst calling my postings BS? Who sticks up for the analysts who don't have a publication like TSC to defend themselves?
>> So far, I think, and I'm sure many others here do too, that
>> most of what you have posted here IS "out of context" - OUT OF
>> CONTEXT WITH THIS FORUM, if not at the very least far removed
>> from the truth.
I am more than more inclined to engage in a discussion with you, but such general statements don't provide the basis for a discussion. Can you name specific things I've stated (aside from slight hyperbole now and again) which are not true - or at the very least, were not statements previously promulgated by other media? I would happily retract anything I have said should it proven to be untrue. |
