Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM)

QCOM 175.25

+0.6%

Dec 19 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: limtex who wrote (30307)	5/19/1999 9:12:00 AM
From: Art Bechhoefer	Read Replies (4) of 152472

Limtex and others, the WSJ article is one more example of why I don't bother reading WSJ, and I only subscribe to BARRON'S for its comprehensive statistics. Wasn't there a former Supreme Court justice who said he couldn't define pornography but he knew it when he saw it? Well, it's very likely that remarks such as those you highlighted are motivated not by responsible journalism but by someone or some group with an agenda. We had Thomas Edison at the turn of the century. Now we have Jacobs and Viterbi, who are at least of the same caliber. Those who fail to realize their genius simply give us more bargain buying opportunities. As for recent insider sales, one cannot draw any conclusions without looking at the details. Viterbi, for example, appears to be doing some reasonably prudent management of trusts for his children. This may involve diversifying holdings, creating an income stream, etc. I have studied insider trading patterns for some 40 years, and I know it is quite easy for someone to draw the wrong conclusions, particularly when it comes to sales.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next