Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (58783)	5/19/1999 3:56:00 PM
From: Kevin K. Spurway	Read Replies (1) of 1582882

Re: "That's why it's futile to argue over such a topic in this way, because it basically boils down to the core of one's beliefs in how a capitalism should work, when a "monopoly" is truly a "monopoly" (and not just a label exploited for political purposes), and what regulatory role the government should play, if any." My point has got nothing to do with government. I've never argued that the feds should get involved. In fact, I've posted on numerous occasions that at least from a predatory pricing standpoint, building an antitrust case against Intel would be a futile effort. I'm just curious about whether Intel is making money on the Celeron line, and if so, how much. Like I said before, I suspect the truth is that on a cash basis they're making money, but from an accounting perspective (factoring in fixed asset depreciation) they're not. Kevin

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next