Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM)

QCOM 178.29

-1.6%

Dec 12 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Bux who wrote (30318)	5/20/1999 9:17:00 AM
From: limtex	Read Replies (2) of 152472

Bux - thanks for the post. We have got some really nice people on this thread. I was only concerned at the undertone of the WSJ article. Particularly has anyone ever confused the Chairman or Q with the corporate 'raider' of the same name. Indeed are their names the same. Why mention it anyway. The use of words is a great art and when used subliminally word can become even more powerful. The tone of the article was to generally discredit IJ. The 'non-association' phrase could andmy guess is in fact just the opposite. The article has begun to have an awfully bad smell to it. Best regards, L

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next