Humbly report, jon, I humbly said the board needs balance, not more balance, but that's probably trivial.
Anyway, guess I'm one of those that sees the progress Go2Net has been making, and don't really see all that much to complain about:
go2net.com
The fact that the market thinks the price of GNET got a "bit" ahead of itself is another matter altogether, of course, and it impacts our perceptions of what is really happening here. If the whole internet sector were not hit and GNET was $200+ right now, perhaps what the company is doing would seem much more successful. Perceptions.
There is always room for improvement -in all the areas you discussed - and I'm all for it. Just don't really see how and why Bill would hinder the Go2Net progress.
Go2Net has been lining up the ducks for a while now, with care and deliberation. It may not be a readily recognizable brand yet, but I humbly believe your E*Trade/Ameritrade example is incorrect, just on the basis of Go2Net's quality and profitability.
The visibility issue is real, and I expect we're not the only ones aware of that. But the main reason I'm here is that it seems to me Go2Net embodies my favorite saying, from Josef Sudek again - "hurry slowly" - and Bill doesn't seem to go against that grain.
Cheers,
Svejk
proofsheet.com
P.S. I humbly appreciate your contributions here. No need to think people don't, even when they vehemently disagree. All a part of the info flow deal. :-) |
