Twister,
I'd say the intent of the thread is to propose and analyze stocks in the Graham tradition. Make it intelligent. The issue of growth at a reasonable price vs value vs no difference has come up before, and a lot of the contributors here who also feel that growth can have a reasonable price have found the Buffettology thread a better place for those kinds of stocks/discussions. This thread is probably better suited for other kinds of more tangible value analysis, given the personalities that seem to have assembled here and return here.
To be fair, I think I brought up CLZR here a couple years ago. Bob had some good counterpoints and that was that.
I'd also say that Jim, Jeffrey and maybe Paul have probably shown some lenience to me here vs some newcomers. I've been castigated by each, though. But I post a lot, and type a lot, and sometimes inappropriate stocks (stocks probably more appropriate for the Buffettology thread or even a Burry v. Twister thread) get mentioned.
It's not really worth fighting about.
Re: touting stocks, as you insinuate I do, you're welcome to your opinion. I'd say there's a tone to touting that I see in some posts that get accused of touting, and you're about the only one who's accused me. I don't see such a tone in my posts. If you do, sorry, I'm not.
BTW, investment limited partnerships are prohibited from acquiring clients through advertising or any sort of public offering. Because I mentioned it here doesn't mean I'm soliciting. It'd be illegal for me to get any investment money from either visitors to my web site or this thread.
Mike |
