SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : CYRIX / NSM
NSM 18.270.0%Jul 31 5:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Jim McMannis who wrote (32476)5/21/1999 4:09:00 PM
From: AB  Read Replies (3) of 33344
 
Jim, film still has "pixels". Resolution is limited, in part, by the size of the grains in the film emulsion.

But my point was more this; many of us here have said that at some point for certain uses, more MHz does not matter in computer apps.

Similar idea for cameras; once a 4x6 print looks great to Joe Consumer, is he going to pay more if he can't see the difference. Take a look at the output from a 2Mpixel digital camera. You might be suprised.

I can't find the link, but dig camera manufs are already complaining that more pixels are not going mean higher sales prices.

Anthony
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext