Saloman tecd research report for today; has im stuff in it.....
     
  TECD: Raising Estimates and Price Target; Reiterate Buy (1H) Salomon Smith Barney Friday, May 21, 1999
  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   --SUMMARY:--Tech Data--Wholesale Information Technology Distribution *Tech Data announced this morning that it has won a $1.4B/yr exclusive  contract with GE Capital Info Technology Solutions under which Tech Data  will take over the procurement and fulfillment of almost all of GECITS'  products. *Tech Data was selected based on its 1) global reach, 2) mgmt, 3) IT   systems, and 4) financial strength. Tech is one of only two distributors  which possesses all of these qualities. *We believe this announcement will be the first of many. This and Compaq's  Distributor Alliance announcement will encourage other resellers/systems  integrators to outsource their product procurement/configuration as well. *We are raising our estimates for both fiscal 2000 and 2001. *We reiterate our Buy rating on Tech Data with a new price target of $50. --EARNINGS:-----------------------------------------------------------------                FYE    1 Qtr      2 Qtr      3 Qtr      4 Qtr      Year Actual   01/99 EPS    $0.46A     $0.54A     $0.63A     $0.64A     $2.27A    Previous 01/00 EPS    $0.53E     $0.55E     $0.52E     $0.77E     $2.37E   Current  01/00 EPS    $0.53E     $0.55E     $0.56E     $0.79E     $2.43E    Previous 01/01 EPS    $0.66E     $0.69E     $0.72E     $0.81E     $2.88E   Current  01/01 EPS    $0.68E     $0.72E     $0.72E     $0.85E     $2.97E    Previous 01/02 EPS    $N/A       $N/A       $N/A       $N/A       $N/A     Current  01/02 EPS    $N/A       $N/A       $N/A       $N/A       $N/A        Footnotes: EPS are fully diluted.                                                                                                                    --FUNDAMENTALS:------------------------------------------------------------- Current Rank........:1-H                Price 05/20/99......:$39.37 Prior Rank..........:                   Target Price........:$50.00 P/E 01/00...........:16.2X              52 Wk Price Range...:52.43 - 14.62 P/E 01/01...........:13.3X              Proj. 5yr EPS Grth..:N/A% Return on Equity 99.:15.00%             BookValue...........:$18.61 LT Debt-to-Capital..:42.48%             Dividend............:$N/A Revenue 2000........:$17025.00 mil      Yield...............:N/A% Shares Outstanding..:57.00 mil          Convertible.........:No Mkt. Capitalization.:$2244.09 mil       Hedge Clause(s).....:# Comments............:     --OPINION:------------------------------------------------------------------ THE AGREEMENT GE Capital Information Technology Solutions (GECITS) is the third largest  systems integrator/corporate reseller in the United States, with slightly  more than $2 billion/year in product revenue (numbers one and two are  Inacom and CompuCom, respectively). GECITS offers suites of information  technology solutions to large corporations worldwide; the company's  offerings include IT infrastructure management, network design and  integration, software licensing, IT asset management, disaster recovery  and more.   According to this agreement, Tech Data will assume responsibility for the  procurement, vendor management, configuration, fulfillment and logistics  for almost 100% of the technology products that GECITS incorporates into  solutions for its customers, effective August 1, 1999. The exclusive  agreement is for a 3 year term and is currently limited to the U.S.   Tech Data will assume the lease on GE Capital's 200,000 sq foot  Frederick, MD warehouse and purchase all leasehold improvements. This  warehouse has 40,000 sq feet dedicated to assembly and configuration,  with a capacity of several hundred thousand systems annually. Tech Data  will offer jobs to all existing GECITS employees at the warehouse. The  additional Frederick, MD capacity assures that Tech Data's service levels  to existing customers will not be adversely affected.   While the agreement with GE is currently limited to the U.S., we believe  that Tech Data was selected partially based on the company's strong  presence in Europe and worldwide. The agreement positions Tech Data very  well to compete for GE's configuration and fulfillment business in other  geographies.   This is the largest contract in Tech Data's 25 year history and the  largest outsourcing agreement in the history of the channel. We believe  that this agreement, along with Compaq's recently announced Distributor  Alliance Program (see 5/10/99 call note - "Tech Data Selected As One of  Four Compaq Distributors in North America") will encourage other  corporate resellers/systems integrators to pursue similar arrangements.  We believe that Tech Data and Ingram Micro are the best positioned  distributors to win these outsourcing contracts. Resellers/integrators  will demand 1) global reach, 2) financial health, 3) management, and 4)  IT systems and logistics capabilities from potential outsourcing  partners. Tech Data and Ingram Micro are the only two distributors  worldwide who meet all four of these requirements. Indeed, Tech Data  management confirmed that GE considered just two wholesale distributors  for this deal (Tech Data and Ingram Micro).   THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE AGREEMENT This agreement is not an isolated incident--it is the result of the  collective soul-searching currently underway within the corporate  reseller/system integrator channel. In the post-Dell world, resellers are  being forced to re-evaluate their value-add within the IT sales and  fulfullment chain, and they are concluding that product procurement,  configuration and fulfillment ARE NOT THE BEST USE OF THEIR SCARCE  RESOURCES.   Specialization is at the foundation of our modern economy; it assures  that capital is employed in the most efficient manner. Is it more  efficient for thousands of dispersed resellers to carry out duplicate  procurement, configuration and fulfillment efforts, or for all resellers  to outsource these functions to a few distributors with 1) core  competency in these functions, and 2) sufficient volumes to achieve  significant economies of scale? If all resellers outsourced procurement,  configuration and fulfillment to a few distributors, they would all reap  the benefit of being able to share these costs....net, net, there would  be no duplication of cost or effort.   The major inhibitor to programs like Compaq's Distributor Alliance or  GE's outsourcing has been large reseller/integrators' legacy dependence  on hardware sales as a major source of revenue. Corporate resellers have  historically, and continue, to take a 7-10% mark-up on PC hardware and  they derive between 75-95% of their total revenue from hardware sales. In  the near-term, corporate resellers are understandably reluctant to  relinquish this revenue stream; such an action would represent nothing  short of a fundamental change in their business model. Longer-term,  however, we believe that corporate resellers/systems integrators have two  options: 1) exit the product business altogether and outsource  procurement, configuration and fulfillment to a wholesale distributor who  is willing to perform these functions at one half the cost (3-5% gross  margin versus 7-10% for the reseller), or 2) continue losing market share  to Dell AND eventually to the direct sales efforts of CPQ, HWP and IBM.   Until recently, Compaq, HWP, IBM and other IT suppliers had no  alternative but to sell their products through resellers/integrators  whose strategy was to maintain artificially high gross margins at the  expense of market share. CPQ, HWP, IBM and other IT suppliers are now  realizing that they cannot afford to let resellers charge a 7-10%  mark-up, and as a result they are going "direct" to large accounts. In  most cases, "direct" will include the help of a co-located distributor  for product configuration and fulfillment. Corporate resellers need to  reevaluate their true value-add in the IT sales and fulfillment chain.  Where does, and will, resellers/integrators offer unique  value?....service and support.   We believe yesterday's announcement by GE is a landmark one...one which  takes us one step closer to the ideal IT sales and fulfillment paradigm  (see our July 1998 report entitled "The PC Sales and Fulfillment Model  of the Future...and It's Not Purely Direct"). There will be many more   such announcements during the coming 12-18 months which will provide two  benefits to the best positioned distributors: 1) incremental revenue from  the reseller who is outsourcing; and eventually, 2) revenue from other  wholesale distributors who are forced out of the market by their  exclusion from such agreements.    FINANCIAL IMPACT The GE agreement will produce $1.4 billion annually in incremental  revenue for Tech Data beginning August 1, 1999.   While the gross margins on this deal (3-4%) will be lower than Tech  Data's average (5.8%), operating expenses will also be lower based on the  very high volumes inherent in the business. According to CFO Jeff  Howells, pre-tax margins on the GE business are in line with Tech Data's  average (1.20-1.25%) and with the company's goals.   Because Tech Data is merely assuming GE Capital's lease, the required  initial investment should be minimal; CFO Jeff Howells has stated that  the deal should NOT be dilutive to earnings during 2Q99 (July quarter)  prior to the first revenue stream.   The incremental working capital required for the agreement is also  minimal. Wholesale distributors like Tech Data typically finance  inventories entirely with payables, which will be the case with this  agreement as well. In most cases, however, Tech Data is forced to finance  its receivables with debt; as part of the GE arrangement, Tech Data is  paid almost immediately. Net, net, the GE deal will require minimal  incremental working capital and, despite the lower gross margins  associated with the business, should produce very attractive returns on  invested capital.   RAISING EARNINGS ESTIMATES We are raising our F2000 and F2001 estimates for Tech Data to reflect the  impact of this announcement. We are raising F2000 from $2.37 to $2.43 and  F2001 from $2.87 to $2.97. Our new estimates imply 22% earnings growth  during F2001.   We believe there are several potential sources of upside to our revised  estimates. First, as we said at the time of Compaq's Distributor  Alliance announcement, we believe that Tech Data could potentially earn  more than its proportionate share of the revenue placed in play by the  DAP announcement based on its 1) global reach, 2) strong management, 3)  rock solid IT systems and logistics capability 4) strong balance sheet,  and last but not least, 5) its lead with co-location and configuration in  co-location. Second, we believe our estimates regarding the incremental  revenue accruing to Tech Data from the GECITS deal are conservative. And,  finally, we expect more such announcements during the coming 12-18 months.   VALUATION AND PRICE TARGET Tech Data's forward twelve month price-earnings multiple has risen from  9X to 15X in one month. The company's core valuation range since 1991  has been 11-21X forward twelve earnings. While our previous target  multiple was 14X, we now believe that Tech Data shares deserve a multiple  at least in the mid-point of their historical range, or 16X. Not only  have the Compaq DAP and GE agreements prompted a significant acceleration  in earnings growth during F2000 and F2001, they have also demonstrated  unequivocally that the best positioned wholesale distributors will be an  increasingly important link in the IT supply chain and that consolidation  will regain momentum. Moreover, 16X still represents a significant  discount to Tech Data's F2001 EPS growth rate of 22%.   Our 16X target multiple implies a new twelve month price target of $50,  or 26% upside from the current share price.    IT'S NOT TOO LATE TO BUY...REITERATE BUY (1H) RATING Despite the 70% rise in shares of Tech Data since our initiation of  coverage on April 8, 1999, we reiterate our Buy (1H) rating on the  shares. Current estimates, which we believe are conservative, suggest the  potential for an additional 25% upside during the coming twelve months.  Moreover, as we have said repeatedly, we believe that there will be  further such announcements during the coming 12-18 months which will  prompt additional upward revisions to earnings estimates. Finally, we see  the potential for significant multiple expansion as investors become  aware of the critical role that wholesale distributors play in the IT  supply chain (see our 4/8/99 initiation of coverage call note entitled  "Initiating Coverage on Tech Data with a Buy (1H) Rating").   UPDATE ON THE APRIL 1999 QUARTER During yesterday's conference call with analysts, CFO Jeff Howells  confirmed that Tech Data exceeded our revenue estimate of $3.8 billion  for the April, 1999 quarter. Howells also expressed comfort with the  consensus estimate of $0.52 (our estimate is $0.53). We remain  comfortable with our estimate.   Tech Data will report April quarter earnings on June 7 after the market  closes. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- #  Within the past three years, Salomon Smith Barney, including its parent, subsidiaries and/or affiliates, have acted as manager or co-manager of a public offering of this company.   Salomon Smith Barney is a U.S. registered broker-dealer.  It is a member of Citigroup Inc. and is affiliated with Citibank, N.A. and its subsidiaries and branches worldwide (collectively "Citibank").  Despite those affiliations, securities recommended, offered, sold by, or held at, Salomon Smith Barney:  (i) are not insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation; (ii) are not deposits or other obligations of any insured depository institution (including Citibank); and (iii) are subject to investment risks, including the possible loss of the principal amount invested.     Salomon Smith Barney including its parent, subsidiaries and/or affiliates ("the Firm"),  may from time to time perform investment banking or other services for, or solicit  investment banking or other business from, any company mentioned in this report.   For the securities discussed in this report, the Firm may make a market and may sell to or buy from customers on a principal basis. The Firm, or any individuals preparing this report, may at any time have a position in any securities or options of any of the issuers in this report.  An employee of the Firm may be a director of a company mentioned in this report.    Although the statements of facts in this report have been obtained from and are based upon sources the Firm believes to be reliable, we do not guarantee their accuracy, and any such information may be incomplete or condensed.  All opinions and estimates included in this report constitute the Firm's judgment as of the date of this report and are subject to change without notice.  This report is for informational purposes only and is not intended as an offer or solicitation with respect to the purchase or sale of a security.  This report was prepared by Salomon Smith Barney Inc. and is being distributed in Japan by Nikko Salomon Smith Barney Limited under license.  This publication has been approved for distribution in the United Kingdom by Salomon Brothers International Limited, which is regulated by the Securities and Futures Authority.  The investments and services contained herein are not available to private customers in the UK.  This report does not take into account the investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs of any particular person.  Investors should obtain individual financial advice based on their own particular circumstances before making an investment decision on the basis of the recommendations in this report.    The research opinions of the Firm may differ from those of The Robinson-Humphrey Company, LLC, a wholly owned brokerage subsidiary of Salomon Smith Barney Inc.      Salomon Smith Barney is a service mark of Salomon Smith Barney Inc.      (c) Salomon Smith Barney Inc., 1999.  All rights reserved.  Any unauthorized use, duplication or disclosure is prohibited by law and will result in prosecution.
  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  RESEARCH DISCLAIMER 
  This study is not a complete analysis of every material fact respecting any company, industry, security or investment. Opinions expressed are subject to change without notice, Statements of fact have been obtained from or based upon sources considered reliable but no representation is made by this Firm or any of its affiliates as to their completeness or accuracy. This Firm or persons associated with it may own or have a position in any securities or investments mentioned in this study, which positions may change at any time, and may, from time to time, sell, or buy such securities or investments. This Firm or one of its affiliates may from time to time perform investment banking or other services for, or solicit investment banking or other business from, any company mentioned in this study. An employee of this Firm may be a director of a company mentioned in this study. Neither this study, nor any opinion expressed herein should be construed as an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to acquire any securities or other investments mentioned herein. This study has been approved by Salomon Smith Barney Europe Ltd., a firm that is regulated by the Securities an Futures Authority. The research opinions of Salomon Smith Barney Inc., including subsidiaries and/or affiliates, may differ from those of the Robinson-Humphrey Company LLC, a wholly-owned brokerage subsidiary of Salomon Smith Barney Inc.
  © Copyright 1999 Salomon Smith Barney Inc.. All rights reserved, Any authorized use, duplication or disclosure is prohibited by law and will result in prosecution.
  The prices and information for any security shown on this page may differ from the prices and information for that security on other sections of the site.
  The research ratings and commentary shown on this site are as of their original publication date. Salomon Smith Barney is under no obligation to update such information to reflect circumstances that may occur after such a date, and such information may differ from previously published ratings and commentary. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.  |