Skyridge, I still believe you're an insider, in spite of your denial...
1) Most people reviewing your posts, since January, which often begin by: "I was told"... would concur with that premise and ask: "Who told you?". I personally don't have a problem with that, but others might.
2) Keep the debate away from personal attacks: if I was stupid I would still be in BHUB, instead of cashing in my profits around the $14.00 mark.
3) Bennett's intention was in fact to sell the Company when it reached a certain number of users. The post below was sent to him for comments and he didn't have any problem with it, as I recall:
Message 7886303
4) IMHO, the secret PP was done for the benefit of insiders only and to afford them voting control over the Company. I am waiting for you to disprove that with verifiable facts. The financing didn't have to be a PP under such disadvantageous terms.
"Honest" management, first think of offering a piece of the pie to faithful existing shareholders by offering a right to acquire additional shares at say, 25% discount to the market. But they didn't do it because it wouldn't have given them and friends the voting control over the Company. That's why, IMHO, I believe the deal to be borderline fraudulent and should be investigated by SEC.
5) Conclusion: I do hope that enough disgruntled shareholders contact John Stark at the SEC, e-mail: enforcement@sec.gov and require a full investigation.
Regards, F. Goelo + + + |
