Spike Lee, to answer the second first, maybe because the Spragues control the stock with anti-takeover clauses and they were not offered what they believe the company will be valued at in 2,3,5, years. Actually, a presumptuous question as it implies you know there are not, and have not been, such talks.
For the first question, I don't want to answer for Snackman (as you did not want to answer for Oliver), but we just saw a very suspicious 50% shake out preceded by bear posters. Indulge us with some well deserved suspicion of new bears until we hit $40 again. It won't be a long indulgence period IMHO.
|
