SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : How To Write Covered Calls - An Ongoing Real Case Study!

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Herm who wrote (10869)5/23/1999 8:13:00 PM
From: FruJu  Read Replies (2) of 14162
 
Rolling out to reduce capital gains taxes...

Herm, I know in general you don't like to buy back calls if you're
going to get called out, but I just decided to do so this past expiry
for tax reasons. How do you feel about the following reasoning:

I am long 2000 IDTI at an average price of 6 3/8. Through CCing I've
reduced my NUT to 4.74.

I was short 20 MAY 7.5 calls at 7/16 sold back in early April when IDTI
first tagged the upper BB (it's been tracking it up ever since per
chart below)

<http://www.askresearch.com/cgi-bin/chart?symbol=IDTI&exchange=USA&size=640x480&months=6+months&type=Bar&color=Graph+Paper&scale=Logarithmic&moving1=50+day&moving2=None&moving3=None&moving=bollinger&bollinger=20+day&sto=15-5-5&wpr=12&chart=rsi&rsi=8&macd=12-25-9&roc=16-8&mfi=13>

I was going to let myself get called out and take the profit of $6500
or so but then looked back to see exactly when I had bought the 2000
IDTI. Turns out it was back in July 1998, so if I let myself get
called out this month, I'd be looking at a short terms capital gains
tax rate on the difference between (6 3/8 - 7/16) to 7 1/2, or about
$3000.

So instead, I decided to buy back the MAY 7.5 calls (at a loss, 1 1/16)
and roll out to August 7.5 (1 7/8) so assuming I'm called out then, it
will be a long term capital gain (saving me about 13% on the profit)
on both the 6 3/8 to 7 1/2 rise, PLUS the 1 7/8 option (as I understand
the inclusion of CCs at the same tax rate as the underlying security
even if the CCs are short term). In the meantime, my NUT has been
reduced to 4.74 - 7/16 + 1 1/16 - 1 7/8 = 3.5.

Is this a correct understanding of the tax rules, and do you think this
was a valid reason for rolling out in this case?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext