Dream Machine ( Build your own PC ) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Dream Machine ( Build your own PC )

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Spots who wrote (7575)	5/23/1999 8:43:00 PM
From: Clarence Dodge	Read Replies (1) of 14778

Spots Naw, show me where (you wrote) I'm personally not so keen on the bios option for my backup OS, simply because I don't trust the OS to make good sense of the drive letters. I'd rather have a standard dual (or multi) boot that I see every time I boot up, such as either NT or the various boot managers provide. (Snip) " That I see everytime I boot up" meant to me a boot option for the backup when booting IDE 1. I tried putting the backup NT in a bootable partition next to the primary C: boot partitiion and was unable to get it to boot. my memory is that I recommended you use the NT on your IDE2 drive as a dual-boot backup for your main NT on IDE1. Didn't I? Yes..you did. I had the impression that recommendation was made because I was unable to create a second boot option for IDE 1. I DID recommend you dual-boot the backup with the primary rather than counting on the bios boot. Ok...now I think I see what your saying. Keep the backup on IDE 2 (D:) but but the reference to it in the IDE 1 boot.ini. I also put a clone of my primary NT in the D partition........... This subject may be of interest, which I will be happy pursue further at another time if anyone wants to talk about it. The idea of a separate up-to date working clone of primary C: is of great interest to me and ZP as well. There has been some discussion of using an app called Second Copy on a daily schedule which simply copys designated files from one place to another at the prescheduled time. One problem I saw was that opened files were skipped. There are other apps such as Bxcopy and Auto Mirror which will also copy open files. But these last apps are real-time which is a problem of another sort. This where we left the idea. I realize your not planning uptodate to mean on a daily basis but whatever the refresh rate is the idea is still the same. Thanks for your recent sysinternal utilities. I'll definitely take a look. If a uttility passes your muster..well that saying something.. Clarence

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next