SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)
INTC 34.50+2.6%Nov 21 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: kash johal who wrote (81382)5/23/1999 11:35:00 PM
From: Tony Viola  Read Replies (2) of 186894
 
Kash,

frankly at low frequencies the kryotech stuff makes no sense, but at the 1Ghz range
it seems like a pretty compelling solution and certainly considering the costs and
isses of dual and quad CPU's.

What issues? Multiple CPU systems have been around since the 80's. There is no mystery about them. IBM has SMPs up to 12 way, Sun to 64, Intel to 8 (actually 9,000 way in the Sandia system). You design it, debug it, and ship it (MP), period. Overhead lost due to MP factors, about 25%. Bottom line is that companies stopped trying to get it all out of one CPU only long ago. Sorry, but I'll put the extra money into an extra CPU or two, rather than a chiller, every time. Now, if they do a chilled 8 - way...

Tony
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext