SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : CYRIX / NSM
NSM 18.270.0%Jul 31 5:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Joe NYC who wrote (32547)5/24/1999 12:39:00 PM
From: AB  Read Replies (2) of 33344
 
Joe, As I understand it, digital cameras are about a single order of magnitude behind film under ALL conditions. Recently, I came across a link that stated film is roughly equal to 10-16 mega-pixels, whereas higher end digital cameras are in the 1-2 Mpixel range.

In the post you referenced, you missed the point about that approach film quality for standard sized prints. I wasn't claiming under all conditions, just for near standard sized prints, ie 4x6.

I think it's also true that the consumer market is shifting away from concerns about film "graininess" and resolution to speed and convenience. Witness the popularity of ISO 200, 400, and 800 films. Recently, I have had some trouble finding ISO 100 film. So it would seem that the consumer either doesn't know/care that higher speed film typically results in a lower resolution picture, maybe doesn't care about enlarging, or is simply confused and equates higher ISO number with higher quality and can't tell the difference. You know, "ISO speed sells", etc.

Anthony
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext