Zeev and all,
Let me just say that you are all responding with insufficient information and always will if you are a GPGI investor. Sufficient informiation is all inclusive and has never been had here.
One can pump or dump based on any chosen information, but always on insufficient information.
The company makes a big deal out of releasing information to all at once, but there is a "big leak" system in place for favored insiders.
Can be seen, can be seen, and needs to be cleaned up, period.
Now, down with the negative and up with the positive--
Am I to understand that Dennis is in the Desert?
Minding the conpany interests! --I view that as extremely positive.
Whatever you might think of his PR efforts, I know his capabilities, and he is only incompetent when he listens to Jensen--Perhaps we have something going here.
As for the current situation, buy if you are inclined, but I have told all here to wait for the refiners check, and this sample is easily affordable to one who would be inclined to forge it. Not saying anything of the sort, only pointing to possibilities. A large and substantial check would be extremely troublesome to fake by such a small and underfunded company.
Return of the questionable shares has been alluded to, but is not fact--it needs to be fact, then perhaps their other shares would be appreciated to comppensate for the loss by market action.
What company would send out market packets while there are ethical questions afloat about company leadership--Does not compute.
Lets get a clean slate, then send out the packets, get the stock moving by true results, then management can steal back later--Just, sorta joking--happens all the time!!
What is needed is some real results via the refiner, and I am not saying that that is not forthcoming, and some reward of the shareholders, then we can recommend the stock to our friends!
I would be willing to bet that we collectively could exceed the results of the investor packed by an order of magnitude, if we were convinced in the validity of the investment.
Reward us, then be rewarded, Jack!! |
