SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Currencies and the Global Capital Markets

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Sam who wrote (1674)5/25/1999 10:29:00 AM
From: Ahda  Read Replies (2) of 3536
 
How much would you pay for the domain COMPUTER.com?















Posted at 10:29 p.m. PDT Monday, May 24, 1999

'90s unkind to workers
Study: Lower wages, less job security downside to 'New Economy'
BY JONATHAN RABINOVITZ
Mercury News Staff Writer

Put aside the wonders of the Internet and the overnight stock-option fortunes of high-tech entrepreneurs: Many California workers are taking home less in real wages than they were at the start of the decade, have a less secure job than their parents had at the end of the 1970s and are more likely to have longer hunts for new positions once unemployed.

That is the essence of a report scheduled to be released today in Sacramento by Working Partnerships USA, a San Jose-based research group established by Amy Dean, the head of the South Bay AFL-CIO Labor Council.

The report is a critique of the so-called ''New Economy'' that highlights the declining earning power and growing instability for those working in low-skill jobs in California. Written by Working Partnerships, in conjunction with the Washington D.C.-based Economic Policy Institute, a liberal research organization, it provides the statistical background for a broad new legislative push for an expanded safety net of programs for middle class and low income workers.


Equality yes low employment figures i wonder why?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext