SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials
AMAT 254.72+0.9%Dec 1 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Proud_Infidel who wrote (30592)5/25/1999 9:08:00 PM
From: Sun Tzu  Read Replies (1) of 70976
 
The key to understanding what he is saying is the investment time horizon. Indeed if a company can be assured any rate of growth which is significantly above the bond yields for a very long period of time, no price is too great. The problem is that you cannot be assured of the growth rate for more than 2~5 years. This is because as soon as it becomes clear that there is money to be made in that business, competitors will come en masse. Not to mention that the company may fail on itsown for reasons beyond its control.

Here is another way to look at it. You can consider stocks as "bonds" with variable interest payments (i.e. earnings). So calculate the present value of a "bond" that will pay you increasing amount of interest at a rate of 8% for the next 100 years and you will see what Old Ben is telling you here.

regards,
Sun Tzu

P.S. As I've been saying for a long time, it is the investment horizon that matters the most.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext