If VTS's operational debut (with or without the NYSE) is successful, an investment in Ashton in mid July at 20-40 may be a safer and technically "better" investment than one today in the 14-16 range. All you have to weigh is the additional profit you could make taking on the more "speculative" investment that ATG is today against the lower risks associated with buying after a successful launch of VTS, where (if it is fact successful) the stock price likely will be 2-3 times what it is today. Of course, those of us investing long today will have uncertainty until after July 1, and will apparently have to put up with Auric's unpleasant venom, which cannot be silenced until certain events occur (and which will never be silenced if, by some twist of fate, those events never happen), because you can't prove that ATG will be successful until after system launch. C'est la vie.
Auric - Either you are clueless about Ashton or you do this posting intentionally - I'm not sure which is worse. And, by the way, what do you know about "big money"?? What special background do you bring to this industry that qualifies you to assure us how the big money will crush Ashton. It's always the same thing -every now and then, some little company with great ideas, great timing and great technical skills comes along and executes, and in doing so, debunks every cliche there is about how the little guy always gets crushed by the big money. The 90's are full of great companies that have made it huge through hard work and against all odds.
MST |
