SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : e.Digital Corporation(EDIG) - Embedded Digital Technology
EDIG 0.00010000.0%Mar 20 5:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Savant who wrote (4821)5/27/1999 2:11:00 AM
From: chris431  Read Replies (1) of 18366
 
I would hypothesize that there is a difference between placing a stream of non-constructed data onto the memory chip (ie. RIO....you have your data stream already created in the form of the pre-recorded MP3 (pre-created bits) on your PC) and taking external source (voice/mic), running it through a process to create the bits (chip that takes the microphone input and creates bits out of it) and then placing those bits on the memory chip. As such, I will further hypothesize the patent is differentiated by the fact it covers data that is created in "real-time" and then moved to memory, rather than data that is simply transferred in a sequential manner (as such, you could transfer the "real-time" block onto a PC, and the transfer back over to the device would no longer be covered). It is the aspect of "voice recording" that I believe makes it different than merely "replaying a voice."

In the few patent cases I've read, the differences are almost arcane enough to make ones head spin (or fall asleep). But, I guess that's how the creation process is best served.

"EDIG Within" sounds very appropriate to me. Nice one! And as a reward, post your pic! :)

Chris
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext