SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : TSIG.com TIGI (formerly TSIG)
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Boyd Zander who wrote (29181)5/27/1999 12:07:00 PM
From: The Swordsman  Read Replies (1) of 44908
 
I think that there's another element of appeal for Dr. Frankel to be appointed to a full voting seat on TSIG's Board.

Has anyone recognized that John Hwang in a just few months has emerged as the architect of TSIG's marketing plan? TSIG was a so-called card company and is now a much larger entity. While the card idea seemed good enough at the time the whole package is where we are and need to be to realize the great ambition we all have for TSIG.

With this being said, combined with the fact that Dr. Frankel has the closest relationship with Mr. Hwang, doesn't it follow that an independent Board is also a requirement for Mr. Hwang to succeed? Therefore if Dr. Frankel and almost 20,000,000 shares are denied a voting voice on the Board, where will that leave Mr. Hwang?

Is there a possibility that if Mr. Gordon foolishly rejects Dr. Frankel for a voting seat on the Board that Mr. Hwang could elect to depart the company for greener pastures, or at least pastures where there is a an opportunity to function without the stranglehold of a known loser?

An even greater question is does Robert Gordon even have an iota of an idea as to how important John Hwang is to TSIG, and would Mr. Gordon's history of what appears to be bad decisions continue forward and just let Mr. Hwang get away?

While probably not fatal, this imho would have a very serious negative impact on everything that's been achieved to date. Not to mention a share price that due to outrageously bad PP conversion terms would probably result in well over 100% dilution and the subsequent downward spiral.

John Hwang must not be lost to Mr. Gordon's personal caprice.

SC
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News