Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: pezz who wrote (50070)	5/27/1999 10:55:00 PM
From: Johannes Pilch	Read Replies (1) of 67261

>Come on my friend you were a bad guy for quite a long time and nobody turned you in.< Someone in fact did turn me in, and I think it was Daniel himself. >I won't argue who started it...< I would. It is critical to the point. If ANYone is to be kicked off, then it certainly must be Daniel, as he provoked the garbage. >...but you were the Pus Pot originator were you not?< Not exactly. I called Daniel a very bad name (a bucket of muscus or something awful), and he modified it to suit his ineffective purposes. Even so, I did it once and then eventually apologised. Daniel made his pus comments part of his culture. He then increased the silliness by attempting all sorts of other childishness. If anyone should have been nailed here, it should have been Daniel. I don't like this stuff of ratting on people. I would rather just meet in a field somewhere and shoot one another. Nevertheless, if the guy wants to be reckless to every dang body and annoying just to be annoying, changing his name and other ninth grade antics (Dang! Daniel is supposed to be a grown man!), then I can understand why someone else would turn him in.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next