The Thread Formerly Known as No Rest For The Wicked Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The Thread Formerly Known as No Rest For The Wicked

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Art M who wrote (46607)	5/27/1999 11:11:00 PM
From: jimbos	Read Replies (1) of 90042

I really like the idea of the no collars, hoping INF isn't stuck in the 26 range for 3 months, waiting for this deal to close. Now let's say INF's stock goes up to say 30, then wouldn't they not have to issue as many shares to cover the buyout price. Or because of the no collar, OSI should move in lock step with INF and the same amount of shares will have to be issued regardless, because the buyout price would be higher, but with a stock that is at a higher price. Just trying to get a handle of the dilutive factor. Am I making sense??

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next