Ask John Galt... Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Ask John Galt...

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Ignacio Mosqueira who wrote (1937)	3/13/1997 12:34:00 PM
From: John Galt	of 4006

You wrote - >>Terrence I am happy to tell you that it is becoming increasingly clear that we now understand the quantum mechanics of black-holes from a string theory point of view. Needless to say this is significant progress. Hawking's calculation was of course semi-classical. The new computing methods suffer none of the infinities that so bothered you and Galt. Nevertheless they confirm and extend Hawking's results.<< It becomes clear now that you have submitted as evidence that along with Father Terrence and John Galt, other highly intelligent men of science were also concerned with the infinities and other such anomolies. Of course, you Iggy, were unconcerned. If the science held, instead, that black holes were comprised primarily of CAT SHIT, John Galt is certain you would be its' foremost advocate. Iggy, your claim as a scientist is ludicrous. At best, you are no more than a reporter -- and a bad one at that. You are pedistrian and a monolithic bore. >>These are very recent developments.<< Only in your eyes, Iggy. These findings (quark subunits and the inevitable collapse of the standard model) was submitted by John Galt years ago and is just now being made public.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next