SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Neocon who wrote (50153)5/28/1999 1:13:00 AM
From: one_less  Read Replies (1) of 67261
 
Well, Neocon you guys keep saying he was clearly warned yet refused to mend his ways, so he deserved it. Dan continually warned you guys that he would give up on substantive debates because he thought it unfair to be teamed up on all the time. Lots of people slammed him personally and often teamed up to overwhelm whatever point he was presenting; when he posted articles or comments on articles from the left. He made his position clear that he was ready willing and able to call names back or forth with individuals. Well, some of the members of this thread didn't mend their ways so he told you clearly the result and that he would stick with the nihilism as a counter. You and others didn't change. You, for example kept with your approach to reform Daniel. I agree, you were patient and the assaults were often one sided. But you didn't head his nihilistic confrontation. If you don't like being struck by a rattlesnake do you continually come back and try to reason with it or do you move away from the reach of its venum? He wasn't being sneaky about it or anything.

I probably agree with Daniel less often than you do. Yet, I'm not on his list of tag team members. Its not for my sweetness, ask pezz or lorrie.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext