Francoise, quit trying to defend your nonsense post, you just make yourself look even dumber.(kinda like adding one to infinity if you ask me) If a company buys another, and the acquired company doesn't turn out to make as much as thought, or to be all that it's cracked up to be, that's too damn bad. This isn't Wal Mart where you can try it for two years and then take it back if it breaks. Your supposed to go over the records and know something about the operations of the company your buying. In short you do what we do, and you never have, DD. This is another reason you see deals collapse, accounting irregularities are discovered. If they're not, too damn bad, a deals a deal. It can play hell with your stock(Cendant). Or how about the folks that bought Snapple, name escapes me at the moment. Paid huge for it, business didn't grow like planned, sold a couple of years later for a gigantic loss. That's the way it's done, a deal is a deal, with most folks. Of course I can see how a silicon impregnated piece of slime like yourself would always look for an escape clause, even years after the fact. Face it Francoise, you either don't have a clue, or have one but are put in the unenviable position of defending this POS at every turn thanks to your offshore tout service.
Mr. Burns |
