Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN)

AMZN 234.70

-1.2%

Nov 14 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: TwoToTango who wrote (59192)	5/29/1999 8:27:00 PM
From: Bill Harmond	Read Replies (2) of 164684

>>J. Doherty also based her analysis on two articles published in barrons in the last couple of months or so.....written by no less an authority than alan abelson. Exactly...and given to a writer so it can be published as a cover story to sell Barron's copies with an alarming cover. Glenn is right. Glenn should be given the byline. An Bezos is right not to have taken her call. Charlie Rose was a better, fairer forum. I think the stock should shake this off easily. The strong hands in this stock (the only ones left) were in Amazon long before Barron's discovered it, and the fundamental story is stronger than ever. The story should have been written about BNBN which is sell at a premium to Amazon, but then Barnes is probably Barron's biggest reseller.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next