>>Maybe... I am here to find out. In a year from now, one of us will be right. Today, I am not sure at all and prefer to wait and see.<<
Claude, when I read your posts, there is no "maybe about it" and that's what bothers me. A lot of us tilt the odds in favor because we respect and trust Mike. However, we realize the reality of the situation. Regardless if you realize it or not, you continually infer, suggest and say what amounts to "no way". It's sort of like the "not invented here" thing. I (or Canada) didn't invent it so it can't be true. I'm still reminded of the many who believed that there would be a crash in October of 1997 because there was one in 1987. I agree with your "maybe". if not, I would hock everything I own and put it in MGAU stock. Rightfully or wrongly, you have a pretty good following. When you are negative about something, it carries a "professional" level of weight. So, are you a maybe, a yes or a no. It's time to go on record so we can quote you at later times. By the way, I think a "maybe" is about as optomistic as one can get re mining companies. I do think MAN is a very high maybe, I just don't think it has a high enough risk/reward ratio because of the amount of time required, having to wait and hope for metals to go up, the passive nature of the average investor towards mining companies, the risk of a Latin American border property, the difficulity associated with financing that type of venture, the current price and trend of metals, etc. Seriously, if I can't see the money soon, I am gone.
Joe (getting down to the bottom line) |
