Well, I still don't know where you're claiming I'm misunderstanding your position. I call you hypocritical for claiming to be anti-war in one case, but pro-war in another.
Maybe you need to find another title for yourself. Being anti-war does not provide room for selecting your causes. You either are, or aren't, supportive of using force to resolve certain global problems, regardless of whether that action is the result of continual diplomatic failures or unprovoked aggression.
And you didn't respond to anything in particular that I presented, but just brushed it all off as illogical. I guess that means you're still thinking it over and trying to find the holes in my logic. (I'm sure there are several, so you might want to keep searching).
Madeline vs Mrs. M?? My god man.. now we're really talking important!!!
So if we're talking a scale of ugliness they're both off the scale. If you're referring to arrogance and diplomatic ineptness, Madeline and Mrs. Moby both rank equally on the former, and Madeline far excels in the latter (Mrs. M certainly cannot be considered politically inept, her being the power behind Milo).
Would you care to comment on the reasons that Russia and China might have for effectively permitting Milosevic to continue his aggressions?? Given that the UN would have authorized this operation had it not been for the threat of a veto by both Moscow and Bejing in the security council, I think their agenda requires exploration.
How about it??
Regards,
Ron |
