SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : The Naked Truth - Big Kahuna a Myth

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: bill meehan who wrote (44008)6/1/1999 5:51:00 AM
From: John Pitera  Read Replies (1) of 86076
 
Bill, I see your twin-brother has a different assessment of the Stockmarket Valuation question.......my question is, "which one is the
evil twin brother -vbg-

To the Editor:
Michael Santoli (The Trader, May 24) comments on the relative valuation of
stocks versus bonds. So, let's consider the numbers Alan Greenspan is
looking at. Recently, there was a 5.62% yield on 10-year Treasuries, and a
4.04% earnings yield on the S&P 500. Divide the former by the latter, and
you get 1.392. This tips the comparison 39.2% in favor of Treasuries,
meaning that the S&P is overvalued.
But wait. Let's take the same data and subtract, say, 2% for inflation from
each, and add 3% to the stocks' earnings yielda premium for long-term U.S.
economic growth. That gives us 3.62% net yield for the Treasuries and
5.04% for the stocks. Do the same math again, and stocks seem 28.2% undervalued. Rates would have to go over 7% for stocks to pass above parity with bonds
. So, stocks may have a way to go. That's better, isn't it?
JOHN P. MEEHAN
Orlando, Florida


........From this week's Barron's Mailbag
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext