SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : Sepracor-Looks very promising

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Asymmetric who wrote (3123)6/1/1999 12:29:00 PM
From: Biomaven  Read Replies (4) of 10280
 
Peter,

poor to the point where Sepracor excluded David Maris/BS from analyst conference calls

Maris at one point claimed this, but it is at least unclear that this is correct. Certainly he took part in the last CC (and in fact asked a reasonable question).

Here's our "shoddy journalism" update from Herb Greenberg:

Sepracor slight?: In an item yesterday, analyst Jordan Kimmel was quoted as saying that Sepracor's (SEPR:Nasdaq) management didn't own any stock. That prompted reader Robert Macek, from Ann Arbor, Mich., to accuse me of shoddy journalism because Sepracor's management owns 7.4%. You're right, Robert, they do. Kimmel's explanation: With a developmental stage biotech company, 7.4% might as well be nothing.

So certainly Kimmel wouldn't have suggested buying Amgen back in early 1994 with the stock around 10, given that management ownership at that point was a mere 3.3%, or Biogen at the same time at around 15, given that its management ownership at that point was 6.04%.

Incidentally, all these numbers understate ownership somewhat because they reflect only exercisable options (technically, exercisable within 60 days).

Peter
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext