Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Kevin K. Spurway who wrote (60162)	6/1/1999 8:33:00 PM
From: Marco Polo	Read Replies (3) of 1571345

Have it your way, but I think I've easily won the "argument" thus far with Paul. Do you really think he has the mental capacity to "toy" with anyone? But in fact I did know what I am talking about, and while the K7 can use 200 MHz clocked Rambus or DDR SDRAM, the Coppermine can only get use out of PC-133. Thanks for adding nothing to the conversation. You're almost worse than Paul, at least he tries really hard to make a point (though never quite gets there). What impressed you so much about Pee to tell you he could toy with someone, anyway? The fact that he kept talking about FPUMark performance, when FPUMark obviously needs to be changed to accomodate the K7 architecture, much like the original CPUMark 32 had to be changed to show the Celeron's power over the K6-2? Are you sure you know what you're talking about? And I really don't care if you're a big fan of AMD, I appreciate both AMD and Intel for what they are.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next