|
You would not have read it in an unbiased way anyway,not this week at least, so I teased you...If you deny the self- evidence of the first proposition, well, okay, what can I say...Thus, far, the BB theory still hinges on the idea of a "virtual vacuum", from which the universe originates, and which exists prior to time and space. The oscillating universe solution is still in the inferior position. As far as anyone can figure, there was no matter and energy before the Big Bang...Since the void is nothing, it has no existence. If something existed outside of time and space, it would comport with at least two of the attributes we traditionally ascribe to God...If you think that something arising from nothing makes more sense, I cannot say much, but it seems to me that there are two choices: either the universe is eternal, or it is created. Current science seems to point toward the latter, even if most scientists are loathe to admit it. Hanging a name on the unknown does not make it known? But we have no real idea what anything is...and yet we hang names and strive for glimmers all of the time. Quick, tell me what energy is essentially...you will only be able to give a utilitarian definition. And so it is with God. :-) |
