SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Gorilla and King Portfolio Candidates
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Uncle Frank who wrote (2443)6/3/1999 9:43:00 AM
From: Mike Buckley   of 54805
 
Frank,

You're a better journalist than some of the journalists.:) I was referring to the article, not you, when I used the term, "irrespsonsible."

For me the distinction between the two cases is simple. I'll try to explain.

The DOJ's and Softie disagree profusely on their understanding of what was said and implied in Softie's meetings with competitors, suppliers and customers.

In Intel's case there was no disagreement with DOJ about the substance of the conversations. Instead, the disagreement was whether or not the substance of the conversations were legal.

For me, there is a big difference between the two situations which might partially explain why it became much easier for Intel and DOJ to come to an agreement.

As always, just my opinion.

--Mike Buckley
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News