Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Scumbria who wrote (60356)	6/3/1999 10:37:00 AM
From: kash johal	Read Replies (2) of 1571378

Scumbria, Re: Performance improvement for PC 133/RDRAM Look it's pretty clear this memory argument is a bunch of hogwash. If we can expect a 1-2% improvement then nobodys going to pay extra for it. Perhaps Intel will have the benchmarks "fixed" to properly reflect the performance of RDRAM and PC 133 just like they did with the celery. The idiot who bet the farm on Rambus at Intel to the tune of a few billion dollars should be shot. They could have bought a real company for that kind of money!!! I also think AMD is making a huge marketing blunder by no publicly supporting PC 133 and pushing it against Celerys lower bus speeds. Yes, I know the bus speed is irrelevant but the regular Joe doesn't understand this - remember Mhz sells. Regards, Kash

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next