ANTHONY@PACIFIC has a major credibility problem in that the prices from his post from December 4th, 1998 for his initial picks have significant differences than the prices from the post that BEAR DOWN put up which is from February 2nd, 1999. Why did Anthony improve the prices to make his track record look better on February 2nd, 1999?
The post from December 4th, 1998 is #156 on this thread:
Message 6680431
The post that BEAR DOWN put up is from February 2nd, 1999 is #8469 on this thread:
techstocks.com
For example, on December 2nd, 1998 Anthony said that he shorted TCTV at 16.75 and covered at 11.5625. A couple months later, on February 2nd, 1999 that magically improved to selling TCTV at 25 and covering at 7.25!!
On December 2nd, 1998 Anthony said that he shorted GERN at 11.25, and that the position was still open at 11 with a open profit of .25 A couple months later, on February 2nd, 1999 that magically improved to selling GERN at 18 and buying it back at 11 !!!!!!!!!
On December 2nd, 1998 Anthony said that he shorted SCRM at 17.5, a couple months later, on February 2nd, 1999 that was only rounded up to 18
On December 2nd, 1998 Anthony specifically stated that he sold EGHT at 8 and 14 1/2 for an average of 11.25. A couple months later, on February 2nd, 1999 that magically improved to selling EGHT at 14!! |
