SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Marco Polo who wrote (60488)6/4/1999 1:18:00 AM
From: Elmer  Read Replies (2) of 1571694
 
Re: "I said "bus" not bus. Point-to-point isn't a standard bus, depending on how you look at it. You can't do point-to-point with your current computer, which is how I know you've never overclocked anything. K7 features memory port, similar to AGP as I understand it."

It might be valuable to define the difference between a bus and a port. I'm going to take a stab at it but I can't be certain I'm completely correct. First, a bus allows for multiple entities to access it, so there must be an arbitration protocol directly for the bus, a port has no such requirements because it isn't shared. Second, a bus has a different transmission line signature because of the multiple entities that may or may not be attached. For example the PCI bus may have 1-4 or more devices attached. A port is much easier to impedence match because the loading is fixed and does not change with regards to capacitance or length.

The K7 system architecture uses processor ports. A different port is required for each processor in a multiprocessor system. The P6 architecture uses a system bus which is shared between 1-4 different processors.

EP
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext