SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : INTC
INTC 43.75+0.6%Dec 3 3:59 PM EST
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Jules B. Garfunkel who wrote ()3/15/1997 7:55:00 AM
From: Thomas J Pittman   of 990
 
Hi, Jules, Good to see you again.

I agree. Intel's action is not only justified but also
predictable. It is still more evidence that this co and
its (excellent) management are not willing to overlook
anything just because of their dominant position. I
suspect that this is how they became dominant anyway.
My suspicion is that much of the criticism of the
suit right now is from people who can't view Intel as
anything but a 'big mean company that owns the market
anyway, so why can't they lay off the little guy.'
While this may be attractive to some people, I think,
as you say, that we should not forget that Intel is
using the legal system for exactly what it is intended
for in this case -- to prevent any entity, big or small,
from obtaining unfair profit based on the work or
ideas of others.

My 0.02 worth,

J
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News